🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," stated one European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the regional government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this international conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers globally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.